On 01.02.2016 11:11, Olivier Teytaud wrote:
I am pretty sure that such an implicit expression exists: it is << the number of etc etc....
We do not speak of just the definition of what kind of number to find, but of the construction of finding the number (or already of a compression of its explicit digits). BTW, I think that there is much more storage in the universe than atoms: think of Boltzmann states and quantum states.
-- robert jasiek _______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list Computer-go@computer-go.org http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
