2010/9/7 Petr Baudis <[email protected]> > On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 09:09:51AM -0700, Dave Dyer wrote: > > I take the observation that human players lose at first, then rapidly > learn to win against the best programs to be evidence that the programs have > systematic weaknesses. > My anecdotal evidence points to that one must be sufficiently close in strength for exploting these weaknesses. I cannot drive manyfaces in to a huge semeai where I am one liberty ahead. But I have seen it happen.
So more CPU woudl still make programs stronger lifting the "exploitation bar" > > > > The mono-culture that is developing, with all programs using variations > on monte carlo, is just driving the herd (of programs) up a blind alley. > > So what would you do about that? ;-) > > I do not think there is mono culture happening. Everyone has different playouts, way starting search. So this is monoculture to a degree alfa-beta in moni culture in chess. To me pachi seems to playing differently from AyaMC and neither really resembles manyfaces. And as more CPU comes available some that will allocated to move pruning and playouts creating more diversity. Petri
_______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list [email protected] http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
