I am glad to hear that your system is similar to Rene's. :-)
Here are a few courses of action that we can take:
1) Abandon the existing Fuego-0.4.1,X bots and start new ones with
standards like Fuego-0.4.1-100K,X
Or
2) Measure the trials/turn rate of your existing bots, and
standardize that Fuego-0.4.1,X means the number of trials that you are
getting.
Or both. Or maybe you have other suggestions?
Thanks,
Brian
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Vlad Dumitrescu
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011 11:46 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Computer-go] Fuego standard opponent on CGOS
Hi,
And I am running the ,v versions, on a similar machine and also
without changing the configuration.
regards,
Vlad
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 01:05, René van de Veerdonk
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Brian,
> I run all the ,V (capitalized) versions (lite and hevy) on a single
> Windows8-i7-860 machine in parallel. Pretty much out of the box, I have
not
> tinkered with the configuration files (as they ought to be 'standard'). I
> agree that if they are not hardware independent, that should be fixed.
> René
>
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Brian Sheppard <[email protected]>
wrote:
>>
>> Top line:
>>
>> - I need to know what configuration is being used for the
>> CGOS player named Fuego-0.4.1,V
>>
>> - If you are the owner, please get in touch with me
>>
>>
>>
>> Details:
>>
>>
>>
>> I just started a Fuego-0.4.1,p on 9x9 CGOS, and I started suspecting that
>> something was wrong because it behaved very differently from the existing
>> Fuego-0.4.1,V and Fuego-0.4.1,v.
>>
>>
>>
>> Digging into the "Hevy" suite of programs, I found that the Fuego
>> configuration is not limited by iteration count. So really it is not a
>> standard opponent. I seem to be running my ,p version on a more powerful
>> computer than the ,v and ,V versions.
>>
>>
>>
>> So I have suspended my ,p copy and I am looking for the owner of the ,V
>> and ,v copies so that we can coordinate.
>>
>>
>>
>> Ideally, we can agree on a named, graduated set of Fuego instances like
>> the Mogo3MC3K and Mogo3MC30K instance. I think Fuego-0.4.1-1k,
>> Fuego-0.4.1-10k and Fuego-0.4.1-100k would make a nice set.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Brian
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Computer-go mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Computer-go mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
>
_______________________________________________
Computer-go mailing list
[email protected]
http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
_______________________________________________
Computer-go mailing list
[email protected]
http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
