Well I'm not sure about as many as 500k nodes. I have code that prunes the outputted tree. I limit it to the x-most explored children nodes (and their sub-tree) of each node. This way I still have what I consider to be relevant in the SGF. You could also limit the outputted nodes in other ways, such as depth or winrate.
I use Gogui, but I don't think I've ever tried loading a tree with 500k nodes. -- Francois van Niekerk Email: [email protected] | Twitter: @francoisvn Cell: +2784 0350 214 | Website: http://leafcloud.com On 23 December 2013 02:16, Petr Baudis <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi! > > On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 08:58:14PM +0100, Harald Johnsen wrote: >> why not use the sgf format to dump your tree search ? Fuego does >> something similar and then you can use gogui or any sgf viewer to >> explore your tree search ; you can put comments to add for example >> your rave stats or whatever. The sgf format also supports some tags >> to add graphic hints like top moves. > > On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 10:01:08PM +0200, Francois van Niekerk wrote: >> Have you considered outputting your tree to SGF? You can put as much >> (or as little) information in the tree comments and, assuming you have >> a good SGF viewer, it is easy to navigate the tree and figure out what >> the engine was 'thinking.' Oakfoam has this functionality and I have >> used it in the past to great effect. > > Hmm, I have always assumed that there is no SGF viewer that could > handle ~500k-1000k node SGF files. Which one would you recommend? Most I > have tried already take a while just to load Kogo's. > > Petr "Pasky" Baudis _______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list [email protected] http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
