At 10:42 AM 10/23/2007 -0500, Tom Piwowar wrote
>Flash is OK for YouTube. It's wonderful for ads, since I use Flashblock.
>Now I'm not distracted with flashing and blinking ads.
That raises an entirely different issue. If you take the content is it
okay for you to block the ads? If you don't like the ads maybe you should
go somewhere else for your content?
I pay good money every year for access (for instance) to the NYTimes
special features. I don't think I should have to look at and load ads on a
site that I'm already paying for. I do block ads, but I can't block the
Java content on their site that takes forever to load (and really p***** me
off). I have the software to solve the puzzles--I don't need to have their
stooopid Java on the site. Many of our (members) requests to put up a
simple link falls on deaf ears.
Sue
************************************************************************
* ==> QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in <==
* ==> the body of an email & send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
************************************************************************
* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header "X-No-Archive: yes" will not be archived
************************************************************************
