I pretty much assumed that it was a function of my being on satellite
and assumed that folks using cable or "off the air" didn't have that
problem. Does anyone know why something like that should be happening?
TV never used to be that way in "the old days".
Mike
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 1, 2008, at 10:05 AM, Steve Rigby wrote:
but with all the technology available and with all the technicians
and equipment on hand, why can't they get it right? At a minimum,
they should be able to get the sound and the picture in sync, wouldn't
ya think? Why do consumers want to spend so much money on new digital
televisions and then have to put up with out-of-sync broadcasts,
especially when it can be so easily noticed on a 52" screen?
Steve
I thought it was just me! I'll sometimes be sitting with a room full of
people gazing at a big sreen and I'll be the only one squirming,
covering my eyes and wondering how this can be happening. Frequently
certain feeds are no better synched than youtube.
Drives me nuts.
Mar
************************************************************************
* ==> QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in <==
* ==> the body of an email & send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
************************************************************************
* List archive from 1/1/2000 is on the MARC http://marc.info/?l=computerguys-l
* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header "X-No-Archive: yes" will not be archived
************************************************************************
