On Jan 1, 2008, at 10:22 AM, Tony B wrote:
There's nothing silly about this point.
Well, I meant it was silly in comparison to REAL problems such as warfare. But, I understand your point. From the perspective of those who will spend a lot of time and money to receive and hopefully enjoy TV programming, that audience should not have to be subjected to such poor production standards. It is kinda like the video version of what mp3 has done to music quality standards and what digitizing has done to imaging standards.
Steve ************************************************************************ * ==> QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in <== * ==> the body of an email & send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <== * Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name * Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST * Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L * New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress * Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ************************************************************************ * List archive from 1/1/2000 is on the MARC http://marc.info/?l=computerguys-l * List archive at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ * RSS at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.xml * Messages bearing the header "X-No-Archive: yes" will not be archived ************************************************************************
