> Really. And when exactly was that? The current Zune has a better > feature set than the current iPod Classic by any rational measure, which is all I > said, and which you are apparently unable to contest sine you continue to > dance around it. It doesn't matter what Apple is doing with the classic in > the future. It doesn't matter what Touch can do. It doesn't matter how > popular iPods are or what you thought of the original Zune. None of that has > any bearing on my point whatsoever.
And Apple ripped off Sansa for the Nano's "shake" feature by aping Sansa's low end player, the Shaker, which has been out for over a year. Of course, the press predictably falls all over itself to fawn at Apple for such an "innovative" feature. Wait until everyone finds out that what we think is Steve Jobs is actually the Hypno-toad. ************************************************************************* ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** *************************************************************************
