I wholeheartedly agree with both posts on audio quality or lack
thereof. When I recently went looking for a set of speakers for my
computer, I was shocked to see powered speakers at 10% total harmonic
distortion. Many Internet sites don't even bother posting the THD for
their products.

The worst offender I've heard for lack of audio quality is the top
rated local FM radio station (WTOP). Their studio audio is superb but
the low bandwidth audio which is used for recorded/edited stories is
atrocious. When the weather report comes on, sometimes it is so bad I
have to turn the radio all the way down until the report is over. It
sounds like someone trying to talk under water while chewing marbles
in their mouths. Ditto for the sports reporting, and the problem has
started showing up in the national broadcasters reports.

It really is a shame that the audio quality has degenerated so
drastically in the public mainstream. Unfortunately I don't see
anything being done about it due the "the cost effectiveness" of
crappy audio.

Richard P.

>> It's unfortunate that the standard of audio reproduction is now the built
>> in speakers on a laptop or the earbuds on the rack at Walmart.
>
> It's far from any kind of standard.  It's mass market crap.  Riley,
> most people don't know any better.
>
> I doubt you could make a case that 45 rpm singles and most pop
> LPs, CDs etc. played on crappy equipment sounded anything
> better than an MP3.
>
> I think most people today have not heard enough live music
> to have a standard of comparison, and I'm not talking about
> rock concerts in sports arenas not designed for music here.
>
> There are inevitable compromises in attempting to reproduce
> music as I'm sure you'll agree.  But some methods are better
> than others, as you know.
>
> I like your approach, it seems reasonable to me.


*************************************************************************
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*************************************************************************

Reply via email to