Axel Beckert <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 09:44:19PM +0000, Jörg Sommer wrote:
>> Maybe you could add a short note about using firefox instead of xulrunner
>> on <http://conkeror.org/Installation>, too. I'll check this on Windows
>> next week, but using firefox instead of xulrunner has the advantage the
>> firefox updates itself while the updates for xulrunner have to be done by
>> hand and it's more likely to find firefox already installed on a system
>> than xulrunner.
>>
>> If you have firefox already installed on your system, you can use it
>> instead of xulrunner to run conkeror. The only disadvantage is the page
>> about: shows the firefox logo.
>>
>> firefox -app /path/to/conkeror/application.ini
>
> Somehow I'm surprised that this hasn't been more widespread yet.
Now, I'm using this method to run conkeror on Windows for three weeks and
have done the upgrade from FF 7 to FF 8 without problems for conkeror.
Hence, I think this way to run conkeror is usable and I prefer it over
xulrunner, because Firefox is often already installed on the system.
Bye, Jörg.
--
Geld allein macht nicht glücklich, aber es ist besser in einem Taxi zu
weinen, als in der Straßenbahn.
(Marcel
Reich‐Ranicki)
_______________________________________________
Conkeror mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/conkeror
