Re: "Agenda"

[Robert Justin Lipkin]

In a message dated 7/11/2003 1:52:34 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

The real issue we have been discussing is not whether LAMDA (I think this is the acronym) has an agenda, but the extent to which the judicial majority on the court has adopted that agenda.  Given Dale, the answer strikes me obviously as no.

       I think Mark is clearly right.  Every--or almost every--judicial decision embraces one of the disputing party's position on some matter.  But just think about the implausibility of  concluding that the Court adopts the agenda of the winning party each time it decides a case.

Bobby Lipkin
Widener University School of Law
Delaware