Scarberry, Mark wrote:I would agree as to candidate elections (in which the current officeholders could be using the government entity itself, and government moneys, to perpetuate thier positions of power), but not as to referena. If the question before the electorate is the public policy that will prevail in the community, then the government (which we ordinarily entrust to make policy decisions and which always will be responsible for carrying out those decisions) should be involved in that conversation to the same degree (and with the same amounts of money) as everyone else. I would not have been troubled by the California ads, although I would take momentary pause if (as in the recent California case) they were funded by assessments on the tobacco companies themselves. Howard Wasserman Florida International University College of Law |
- Re: Government Speech and Special Assessments Scarberry, Mark
- Re: Government Speech and Special Assessments Howard Wasserman
- Re: Government Speech and Special Assessments John Nagle
- Re: Government Speech and Special Assessment... Marty Lederman
- Re: Government Speech and Special Assess... John Nagle
- Re: Government Speech and Special Assessment... Howard Wasserman
- Re: Government Speech and Special Assessments Scarberry, Mark