Nominations are now closed.  Please vote.  I'll start a new thread for that.
Karl

On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 10:55 PM, Jack Krupansky
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Great! Anyone on this list can nominate names and vote. The more
> participation, the better.
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "George Aroush" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 10:47 PM
> To: <[email protected]>
> Subject: RE: Soliciting more potential names for the project formerly known
> as LCF
>
>> I have been watching this project from the side line...
>>
>> Can I nominate "Ayvitraya"?  From:
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fictional_universe_in_Avatar#The_Tree_of_Souls
>>
>> "Ayvitraya Ramunong" in Na'vi "is a tree where the Na'vi are able to
>> communicate with the biological network that exists".
>>
>> -- George
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Karl Wright [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 8:07 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: Soliciting more potential names for the project formerly
>> known
>> as LCF
>>
>> One more day... so nominations close tomorrow at 5:00 PM.
>>
>> Karl
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 6:37 AM, Jack Krupansky
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'd give people another day since it seems so quiet.
>>>
>>> -- Jack Krupansky
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------
>>> From: "Karl Wright" <[email protected]>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 3:40 AM
>>> To: <[email protected]>
>>> Subject: Re: Soliciting more potential names for the project formerly
>>
>> known
>>>
>>> as LCF
>>>
>>>> Any objections if I close this list as of 5:00 PM EDT today, and call
>>>> the vote then?
>>>>
>>>> Karl
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Jack Krupansky
>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I few more from my noon walk:
>>>>>
>>>>> Recon ["Re" from Repository and "con" from connectors]
>>>>> Reconn
>>>>> Conx [ala Connects] - treat these four as one for initial voting, then
>>>>> separate
>>>>> Conex
>>>>> Connx
>>>>> Connex
>>>>> Reconx [ala Repository and Connects] - ditto
>>>>> Reconex
>>>>> Reconnx
>>>>> Reconnex
>>>>> Contor ["Con" and "tor" from Connector]
>>>>> Contour [Contor into a word to avoid misspelling]
>>>>> Contango [Connectors are a bit of a dance; a term from commodities
>>>>> futures
>>>>> trading]
>>>>>
>>>>> -- Jack Krupansky
>>>>>
>>>>> --------------------------------------------------
>>>>> From: "Karl Wright" <[email protected]>
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 4:27 PM
>>>>> To: "connectors-dev" <[email protected]>
>>>>> Subject: Soliciting more potential names for the project formerly known
>>>>> as
>>>>> LCF
>>>>>
>>>>>> We're going to have another round of name selection, based on feedback
>>>>>> from the board.  We've also pretty much decided that the last round
>>>>>> did not have sufficient breadth, so here's an open solicitation call
>>>>>> for potential names for the next round.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So hold on to your hats, and throw your suggestions into the ring.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> One word of caution.  Before offering a name, please do your best to
>>>>>> make sure it meets the following criteria:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (1) It's a single word
>>>>>> (2) It's not a very commonly-used word, or a well-known place; ideally
>>>>>> it's not a word you would find in the OED
>>>>>> (3) It does not have negative connotations
>>>>>> (4) A quick google with it in the context of "open source" shows
>>
>> nothing
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (5) No more than 4 syllables
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here's what we've got so far for this round:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Congo
>>>>>> Connie
>>>>>> Heterolink
>>>>>> Heterosource
>>>>>> Heteroweb
>>>>>> Manicon
>>>>>> Manifolio
>>>>>> Manilink
>>>>>> Maniplex
>>>>>> Manisource
>>>>>> Maniweb
>>>>>> Multicon
>>>>>> Ralph
>>>>>> Reconto
>>>>>> RepoMan
>>>>>> Repositor
>>>>>> Reptile
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Some of these don't fulfill the criteria above (e.g. Congo and
>>>>>> Reptile), and may be stricken from the voting list as a result.  But
>>>>>> feel free to riff at will... ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to