There is a workaround, but given the fact that a complex workaround is needed to execute what should be a simple deployment, I'd wonder if we have our priorities straight in releasing 0.1 in this condition. But it's your call. The release process is easy for me, except the pain needed to get everyone to have a look at the artifact and sign off on it, and I can see no particular rush either.
If we do have another RC, I would also like to add Postgresql-based tests into RC9. I've got them just about ready, and will be committing to trunk shortly. Karl On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[email protected]> wrote: > Is there a workaround for the issue? Can't the user create it by hand? > > On Jan 31, 2011, at 1:51 AM, Karl Wright wrote: > >> You can read the details in CONNECTORS-148. >> >> I hesitate to ask this because getting the votes for RC8 just >> finished, and took the better part of a month, but should we produce >> an RC9? This issue was considered a blocker for release, and since it >> appears to not have been fixed, I really think we have no choice. >> Effectively this prevents people from using PostgreSQL with >> ManifoldCF, unless they take manual measures, and I doubt many people >> will be willing to do that. >> >> Karl > > >
