Ok, that's effectively 3 +1's, which is pretty good in this business. If I don't hear any objection, I'll copy the artifact to the download area tomorrow morning.
Karl On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Koji Sekiguchi <[email protected]> wrote: > +1. release the artifacts that are voted on. > > Koji > > (11/02/01 10:15), Robert Muir wrote: >> >> Just my opinion: >> >> 1. release the artifacts that are voted on... its 0.1 and a lot of >> people will likely be still in evaluation stage (likely with derby?). >> Obviously there are bugs, even ones that aren't known, but I think its >> just fine to release with known bugs... better at this stage to get >> the release out there and possibly draw in more people (who might find >> more bugs). >> 2. start working on the next release. besides this bug, for example >> there is the related issue open for improved postgresql testing, etc: >> personally I think this is great, maybe expanding on that idea could >> uncover even more bugs. the known bugs are documented in jira anyway, >> but workarounds or whatever could be put in the wiki in the meantime >> too. I don't think the next release needs to be rushed out to fix the >> bug quickly, either. Its not the end of the world at this point if >> people hit the bug and are drawn into mailing lists/svn/jira/whatever >> >> >> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Karl Wright<[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> There is a workaround, but given the fact that a complex workaround is >>> needed to execute what should be a simple deployment, I'd wonder if we >>> have our priorities straight in releasing 0.1 in this condition. But >>> it's your call. The release process is easy for me, except the pain >>> needed to get everyone to have a look at the artifact and sign off on >>> it, and I can see no particular rush either. >>> >>> If we do have another RC, I would also like to add Postgresql-based >>> tests into RC9. I've got them just about ready, and will be >>> committing to trunk shortly. >>> >>> Karl >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Grant Ingersoll<[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Is there a workaround for the issue? Can't the user create it by hand? >>>> >>>> On Jan 31, 2011, at 1:51 AM, Karl Wright wrote: >>>> >>>>> You can read the details in CONNECTORS-148. >>>>> >>>>> I hesitate to ask this because getting the votes for RC8 just >>>>> finished, and took the better part of a month, but should we produce >>>>> an RC9? This issue was considered a blocker for release, and since it >>>>> appears to not have been fixed, I really think we have no choice. >>>>> Effectively this prevents people from using PostgreSQL with >>>>> ManifoldCF, unless they take manual measures, and I doubt many people >>>>> will be willing to do that. >>>>> >>>>> Karl >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> > > > -- > http://www.rondhuit.com/en/ >
