Artifacts have been copied to the download area, and I'm updating the site mirror now. Karl
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 1:23 AM, Simon Willnauer <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 2:23 AM, Koji Sekiguchi <[email protected]> wrote: >> +1. release the artifacts that are voted on. >> > +1 >> Koji >> >> (11/02/01 10:15), Robert Muir wrote: >>> >>> Just my opinion: >>> >>> 1. release the artifacts that are voted on... its 0.1 and a lot of >>> people will likely be still in evaluation stage (likely with derby?). >>> Obviously there are bugs, even ones that aren't known, but I think its >>> just fine to release with known bugs... better at this stage to get >>> the release out there and possibly draw in more people (who might find >>> more bugs). >>> 2. start working on the next release. besides this bug, for example >>> there is the related issue open for improved postgresql testing, etc: >>> personally I think this is great, maybe expanding on that idea could >>> uncover even more bugs. the known bugs are documented in jira anyway, >>> but workarounds or whatever could be put in the wiki in the meantime >>> too. I don't think the next release needs to be rushed out to fix the >>> bug quickly, either. Its not the end of the world at this point if >>> people hit the bug and are drawn into mailing lists/svn/jira/whatever >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Karl Wright<[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> There is a workaround, but given the fact that a complex workaround is >>>> needed to execute what should be a simple deployment, I'd wonder if we >>>> have our priorities straight in releasing 0.1 in this condition. But >>>> it's your call. The release process is easy for me, except the pain >>>> needed to get everyone to have a look at the artifact and sign off on >>>> it, and I can see no particular rush either. >>>> >>>> If we do have another RC, I would also like to add Postgresql-based >>>> tests into RC9. I've got them just about ready, and will be >>>> committing to trunk shortly. >>>> >>>> Karl >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Grant Ingersoll<[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Is there a workaround for the issue? Can't the user create it by hand? >>>>> >>>>> On Jan 31, 2011, at 1:51 AM, Karl Wright wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> You can read the details in CONNECTORS-148. >>>>>> >>>>>> I hesitate to ask this because getting the votes for RC8 just >>>>>> finished, and took the better part of a month, but should we produce >>>>>> an RC9? This issue was considered a blocker for release, and since it >>>>>> appears to not have been fixed, I really think we have no choice. >>>>>> Effectively this prevents people from using PostgreSQL with >>>>>> ManifoldCF, unless they take manual measures, and I doubt many people >>>>>> will be willing to do that. >>>>>> >>>>>> Karl >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> http://www.rondhuit.com/en/ >> >
