Hi, On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Joshua Lock<[email protected]> wrote: > I think so. I report invalid argument errors back to the caller in > gconnman, invalid argument doesn't seem like the right error here. > I'm not even convinced this should be an error and at the very least it > quietens my debug output.
I guess it is fine to not return any error here, it seems pointless since the caller may not be caching the properties and thus the error may be interpreted as something else. In the other hand connman should not be emitting PropertyChanged signal, since it would affect any client listening to it including the ones that do proper caching. -- Luiz Augusto von Dentz Engenheiro de Computação _______________________________________________ connman mailing list [email protected] http://lists.connman.net/listinfo/connman
