Hi Marcel,
On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 07:03 -0700, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> patch was pretty simple and I just pushed it. The GDBus support for
> async method calls can be a little bit confusing at first.
Oh, I see. That makes sense. Cool.
>
> > > Question still is if we really want this. Is this a desired behavior of
> > > the API. Does it makes things a lot simpler?
> >
> > I think so. I report invalid argument errors back to the caller in
> > gconnman, invalid argument doesn't seem like the right error here.
> > I'm not even convinced this should be an error and at the very least it
> > quietens my debug output.
>
> Fair enough. Patch is upstream.
Excellent, thanks sir!
Regards,
Joshua
--
Joshua Lock
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
connman mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.connman.net/listinfo/connman
