Hi,
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 16:11 +0100, ext Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> For consistency sake, I'd prefer to have this one called report_error_reply,
> and use report_error_data for the structure.
Yes, I'll fix.
> Nothing to change here, but I just want to say that this is not my favorite
> way of requesting a retry from ConnMan. This is not an error after all, and
> imo a regular D-Bus message would make more sense.
> I'll still take it since it seems BlueZ and oFono are doing the same, so I'd
> rather be consistent here as well.
Yes, I agree. Unfortunately it is consistent with Bluez and oFono when
done this way; it is also specified in agent-api.txt.
Cheers,
Patrik
_______________________________________________
connman mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.connman.net/listinfo/connman
