Hi, On 2015-10-20 14:45, Patrik Flykt wrote: > > Hi, > > On Tue, 2015-10-20 at 14:26 +0200, Sven Schwedas wrote: >> On 2015-10-20 14:04, Patrik Flykt wrote: >>> Are any of these necessary for any use cases? If they are needed for >>> something, could the currently specified OpenVPN.MTU be used to derive >>> proper MTUs for the devices involved? >> >> They are necessary for some mobile carriers. We're fixing the tun MTU to >> 576 so OpenVPN doesn't die on (I think) Vodafone Germany's networks. > > Which of the mtu, fragment and/or mssfix options do you end up using and > with what value?
We only change the tun-mtu value, none of the others. It seems to be recommended to change the others too, but it fixed the problems for us, and I didn't want to experiment more at the time. Presumably connman would need to support all? > >> (Though not yet with Connman, it's legacy deployments with >> NetworkManager/manual OpenVPN, and some special industrial modems from >> Vodafone. I can't say just how widespread the issue is otherwise.) > > Cheers, > > Patrik > > _______________________________________________ > connman mailing list > connman@connman.net > https://lists.connman.net/mailman/listinfo/connman > -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen, / Best Regards, Sven Schwedas Systemadministrator TAO Beratungs- und Management GmbH | Lendplatz 45 | A - 8020 Graz Mail/XMPP: sven.schwe...@tao.at | +43 (0)680 301 7167 http://software.tao.at
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ connman mailing list connman@connman.net https://lists.connman.net/mailman/listinfo/connman
