On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Lalatendu Mohanty <[email protected]> wrote: > On 01/22/2016 03:38 PM, Praveen Kumar wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> We need an RPM to contain the utility scripts that drive the ADB. >> These scripts do things like certificate generation. This is also >> where the service files for the various orchestrators will live. >> >> To make it easy for downstream maintainers and to assist in builds, we >> propse that a new git repo be started under projectatomic. The repo >> will be named *adb-utils* and will have the same maintainers as the >> ADB. >> >> This repo will allow us to clean up the Kickstart files for the ADB >> and create an easier to maintain script repo. >> >> Any suggestions/concerns? Any objections? If not, I suggest we >> accept lazy consensus on Wednesday Jan 27 at 0000 UTC. >> > The only objection is the name, the prefix adb makes it not convenient when > used with CDK. It will confuse the user with respect to what is ADB vs CDK.
It will go as package so in downstream we have dist-git as 'cdk-utils' but code-base will be same like we do for kickstart files so that should not be a problem/confusion. > > I can see we see that we will have this issue in future too e.g. when ever > we write a Vagrant plugin or a new package for ADB. Yep we always have naming issues and naming-war still on :) > I would suggest to give a generic name e.g. developer-bundle-utils ( I think > I am terrible with names :) ) or something better. My vote is still for 'adb-utils' (developer-bundle-utils is too generic and not provide much background about project) but we can discuss it in Wednesday meeting. -- Praveen Kumar http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kumarpraveen http://fedoraproject.org/ http://kumar-pravin.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ Container-tools mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/container-tools
