On Jan 25, 2016, at 1:03 PM, Lalatendu Mohanty <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 01/25/2016 05:14 PM, Praveen Kumar wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Lalatendu Mohanty <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> On 01/22/2016 03:38 PM, Praveen Kumar wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> We need an RPM to contain the utility scripts that drive the ADB. >>>> These scripts do things like certificate generation. This is also >>>> where the service files for the various orchestrators will live. >>>> >>>> To make it easy for downstream maintainers and to assist in builds, we >>>> propse that a new git repo be started under projectatomic. The repo >>>> will be named *adb-utils* and will have the same maintainers as the >>>> ADB. >>>> >>>> This repo will allow us to clean up the Kickstart files for the ADB >>>> and create an easier to maintain script repo. >>>> >>>> Any suggestions/concerns? Any objections? If not, I suggest we >>>> accept lazy consensus on Wednesday Jan 27 at 0000 UTC. >>>> >>> The only objection is the name, the prefix adb makes it not convenient when >>> used with CDK. It will confuse the user with respect to what is ADB vs CDK. >> It will go as package so in downstream we have dist-git as 'cdk-utils' >> but code-base will be same like we do for kickstart files so that >> should not be a problem/confusion. >> > > Yes, I thought of that. But the model does not work well for Vagrant plugins > e.g. vagrant-adbinfo.
True, but this isn't a vagrant plugin. This is a support RPM. Let's keep the naming wars separate :) /me heads off to invade the East in the Winter :) _______________________________________________ Container-tools mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/container-tools
