On 01/25/2016 05:14 PM, Praveen Kumar wrote:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Lalatendu Mohanty <[email protected]> wrote:
On 01/22/2016 03:38 PM, Praveen Kumar wrote:
Hi,
We need an RPM to contain the utility scripts that drive the ADB.
These scripts do things like certificate generation. This is also
where the service files for the various orchestrators will live.
To make it easy for downstream maintainers and to assist in builds, we
propse that a new git repo be started under projectatomic. The repo
will be named *adb-utils* and will have the same maintainers as the
ADB.
This repo will allow us to clean up the Kickstart files for the ADB
and create an easier to maintain script repo.
Any suggestions/concerns? Any objections? If not, I suggest we
accept lazy consensus on Wednesday Jan 27 at 0000 UTC.
The only objection is the name, the prefix adb makes it not convenient when
used with CDK. It will confuse the user with respect to what is ADB vs CDK.
It will go as package so in downstream we have dist-git as 'cdk-utils'
but code-base will be same like we do for kickstart files so that
should not be a problem/confusion.
Yes, I thought of that. But the model does not work well for Vagrant
plugins e.g. vagrant-adbinfo.
I can see we see that we will have this issue in future too e.g. when ever
we write a Vagrant plugin or a new package for ADB.
Yep we always have naming issues and naming-war still on :)
I would suggest to give a generic name e.g. developer-bundle-utils ( I think
I am terrible with names :) ) or something better.
My vote is still for 'adb-utils' (developer-bundle-utils is too
generic and not provide much background about project) but we can
discuss it in Wednesday meeting.
_______________________________________________
Container-tools mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/container-tools
