On 03/17/2017 04:29 PM, Lance Ball wrote:
This has been a great conversation. Thanks everyone for your input.
One thing that kind of got lost in the shuffle, though is this.
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 12:37 PM Lance Ball <lb...@redhat.com
<mailto:lb...@redhat.com>> wrote:
I also think that, in addition to the current OpenShift offerings
for Node.js on RHEL and CentOS, we should be providing a larger
matrix of options. Is there any reason not to pursue community
versions of Node.js builder images for the following combination
of OS/Node?
RHEL -> Node 4, 5, 6, 7
rhel7-atomic -> Node 4, 5, 6, 7
Fedora -> Node 4, 5, 6, 7
CentOS -> Node 4, 5, 6, 7
Who will do the packaging and support for these versions? Is Middleware
engineering signing up or are you asking for the RHEL team to do these?
I understand that SCL-provided, supported images for RHEL already
exist for Node.js v4.x and soon to be Node.js v6.x. As you
probably know, some of us are actively working towards a solution
that would allow these supported images to achieve greater
turnaround time, and maintain version parity with all current
Node.js releases.
Would the addition of community provided rhel7-atomic, fedora and
perhaps even rhel images be welcomed?
Anyone have feedback or concerns about this idea?
Thanks
Lance
_______________________________________________
Container-tools mailing list
Container-tools@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/container-tools
--
Brian Gollaher
Red Hat Platform Product Management
Phone: 978 392-3173
Cell: 508 740-6549
bri...@redhat.com
_______________________________________________
Container-tools mailing list
Container-tools@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/container-tools
