In his book "Hoedowns, Reels and Frolics: Roots and Branches of Southern
Appalachian Dance" Phil Jamison discusses quadrilles on pp 33-35 and
elsewhere, especially Chapters 2 & 3.  Thanks, George Mercer

On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 4:13 PM jim saxe via Contra Callers <
[email protected]> wrote:

> To me, the word "quadrille" would usually suggest either Tony's definition
> 1 or his definition 3.
>
> Reading Tony's definition 4 reminds me that I have occasionally noticed
> the word "quadrille" in titles of tunes in 6/8 meter.  Looking in the book
> _Advanced Square Dance Figures of the West and Southwest_ by Lee Owens and
> Viola Ruth (1950), I notice that the tunes therein include "Blackberry
> Quadrille," "Blacksmith's Quadrille," "Bony Smith's Quadrille," and "Ruth's
> Quadrille," all in 6/8.  Also included, however, is a tune titled "Canyon
> Quadrille," which is in 2/4 (but with a lot of dotted notes).
>
> I was unaware of the usage given in Tony's definition 2: "... a set of
> (usually three) squares done with the same partner."  Having read it, I can
> see how the term formerly used for those 19th-century dances in five or six
> figures (with the same partner, but with pauses in the the music between
> figures) could have come to be used for sets of three squares with the same
> partner as done in some areas in the mid 20th century.
>
> While looking around on Youtube a few years ago, I came across some videos
> of "quadrille" dances in Vienna with couples arranged not in square sets
> but in what resemble Becket contra lines.  Here's an example:
>
>      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1IQ1-nRxr64
>
> Note that there is no progression.  Each couple dances pretty much
> exclusively with the couple across from them, the only interaction with
> dancers from an adjacent foursome being an occasional acknowledgment as
> couples dance forward and back on a diagonal.  The figures are of the sort
> that might have been danced alternately by head and side couples in a
> 19th-century quadrille in square formation.  I'd guess that the change to a
> Becket-like formation was intended to reduce the amount of inactivity, to
> make more efficient use of floor space, or both.  It might also reduce the
> total duration of the figures.  I have no idea whether the change in
> formation is a recent innovation or whether it goes back many decades,
> perhaps even into the 19th century.
>
> While looking for a video of a quadrille in Vienna to cite in this
> message, I also discovered some videos of "quadrilles" as danced in
> Jamaica, some in square formation and some not.  I won't cite any video in
> particular; readers who care cane easily find examples for themselves.  I
> don't think I can offer any better speculation than anyone else about how
> these dances might have evolved into what they are now from whatever sort
> of "quadrille" or other dance might have preceded them.
>
> Lest digressions obscure my main point, I'll repeat that the notions of
> "quadrille" most prominent in my mind are Tony's definitions 1 and 3.
>
> --Jim
>
> > On Feb 21, 2020, at 9:55 AM, Tony Parkes via Contra Callers <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Here’s my take on it, from the glossary of my forthcoming book _Square
> Dance Calling: An Old Art for a New Century_:
> >
> > Quadrille              (1) A formal square dance in five or six figures,
> introduced in the early 19th century; the original figures were selected
> from the cotillion (definition 1), although additional figures were written
> later. (2) In the Northeast, a term used until the mid-20th century for a
> set of (usually three) squares done with the same partner. (3) A term used
> by modern square dance callers for a square phrased and prompted in New
> England style. (4) In some areas, a fiddle tune in 6/8 meter.
> <snip>
> _______________________________________________
> Contra Callers mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>
_______________________________________________
Contra Callers mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to