Correction, you are right both ports are open :) 

> On Aug 31, 2016, at 3:30 PM, Luis Gomez <ece...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> OK, then something happened after because today 8181 is the port everybody 
> uses and 8080 is not even open.
> 
> 
>> On Aug 31, 2016, at 12:18 PM, Edward Warnicke <hagb...@gmail.com 
>> <mailto:hagb...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> It did :)  
>> 
>> https://github.com/opendaylight/odlparent/blob/master/karaf/opendaylight-karaf-resources/src/main/resources/etc/jetty.xml#L58
>>  
>> <https://github.com/opendaylight/odlparent/blob/master/karaf/opendaylight-karaf-resources/src/main/resources/etc/jetty.xml#L58>
>> 
>> I know... I'm the one who did it:
>> https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/13546/ 
>> <https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/13546/>
>> 
>> (a lot of work actually went into moving RESTCONF to 8080, because for 
>> backward compatibility it also meant making neutron work with jetty.xml, 
>> because neutron northbound wasn't being deprecated :) ).
>> 
>> Ed
>> 
>> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Luis Gomez <ece...@gmail.com 
>> <mailto:ece...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> If the plan was to shift RESTCONF back to 8080, I do not think that ever 
>> happened :)
>> 
>>> On Aug 31, 2016, at 11:52 AM, Edward Warnicke <hagb...@gmail.com 
>>> <mailto:hagb...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Huh... I remember slightly differently... because the 8080 for the old 
>>> ADSAL couldn't coexist with the RESTCONF, which is why RESTCONF originally 
>>> went on 8181... once ADSAL was deprecated, *then* RESTCONF shifted to the 
>>> 8080 port, with 8181 retained for backward compatibility (I *think* I was 
>>> the one to do all that work... but its a bit murky in my mind).
>>> 
>>> Ed
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Luis Gomez <ece...@gmail.com 
>>> <mailto:ece...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> I think it is the other way around: 8181 is the "official" RESTCONF port 
>>> and 8080 was used before in ADSAL and kept for API backwards compatibility 
>>> reasons.
>>> 
>>>> On Aug 31, 2016, at 5:57 AM, Edward Warnicke <hagb...@gmail.com 
>>>> <mailto:hagb...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 8080 is the primary port... 8181 was a historical artifact.
>>>> 
>>>> Ed
>>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 3:18 AM, navin.kukr...@suse.com 
>>>> <mailto:navin.kukr...@suse.com> <navin.kukr...@suse.com 
>>>> <mailto:navin.kukr...@suse.com>> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> Why do we have two ports in etc/jetty.xml file? 
>>>> 
>>>> I installed Beryllium on a server but I am running another service on port 
>>>> 8080 and when I load dlux feature, it stays in graceperiod because port 
>>>> 8080 is unavailable. I completely removed 'addConnector' section for port 
>>>> 8080 from etc/jetty.xml  file and it worked. 
>>>> 
>>>> Is port 8080 just a abckup port for web portal?
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Navin
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> controller-dev mailing list
>>>> controller-dev@lists.opendaylight.org 
>>>> <mailto:controller-dev@lists.opendaylight.org>
>>>> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/controller-dev 
>>>> <https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/controller-dev>
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> controller-dev mailing list
>>>> controller-dev@lists.opendaylight.org 
>>>> <mailto:controller-dev@lists.opendaylight.org>
>>>> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/controller-dev 
>>>> <https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/controller-dev>
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 

_______________________________________________
controller-dev mailing list
controller-dev@lists.opendaylight.org
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/controller-dev

Reply via email to