In any case it would be good to clarify in documentation or somewhere which port should be primarily used in ODL as I think many people (including me) thought it was 8181 as I can see in many user guides and even in our system test.
BR/Luis > On Aug 31, 2016, at 3:50 PM, Luis Gomez <ece...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Correction, you are right both ports are open :) > >> On Aug 31, 2016, at 3:30 PM, Luis Gomez <ece...@gmail.com >> <mailto:ece...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> OK, then something happened after because today 8181 is the port everybody >> uses and 8080 is not even open. >> >> >>> On Aug 31, 2016, at 12:18 PM, Edward Warnicke <hagb...@gmail.com >>> <mailto:hagb...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>> It did :) >>> >>> https://github.com/opendaylight/odlparent/blob/master/karaf/opendaylight-karaf-resources/src/main/resources/etc/jetty.xml#L58 >>> >>> <https://github.com/opendaylight/odlparent/blob/master/karaf/opendaylight-karaf-resources/src/main/resources/etc/jetty.xml#L58> >>> >>> I know... I'm the one who did it: >>> https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/13546/ >>> <https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/13546/> >>> >>> (a lot of work actually went into moving RESTCONF to 8080, because for >>> backward compatibility it also meant making neutron work with jetty.xml, >>> because neutron northbound wasn't being deprecated :) ). >>> >>> Ed >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Luis Gomez <ece...@gmail.com >>> <mailto:ece...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> If the plan was to shift RESTCONF back to 8080, I do not think that ever >>> happened :) >>> >>>> On Aug 31, 2016, at 11:52 AM, Edward Warnicke <hagb...@gmail.com >>>> <mailto:hagb...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Huh... I remember slightly differently... because the 8080 for the old >>>> ADSAL couldn't coexist with the RESTCONF, which is why RESTCONF originally >>>> went on 8181... once ADSAL was deprecated, *then* RESTCONF shifted to the >>>> 8080 port, with 8181 retained for backward compatibility (I *think* I was >>>> the one to do all that work... but its a bit murky in my mind). >>>> >>>> Ed >>>> >>>> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Luis Gomez <ece...@gmail.com >>>> <mailto:ece...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>> I think it is the other way around: 8181 is the "official" RESTCONF port >>>> and 8080 was used before in ADSAL and kept for API backwards compatibility >>>> reasons. >>>> >>>>> On Aug 31, 2016, at 5:57 AM, Edward Warnicke <hagb...@gmail.com >>>>> <mailto:hagb...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> 8080 is the primary port... 8181 was a historical artifact. >>>>> >>>>> Ed >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 3:18 AM, navin.kukr...@suse.com >>>>> <mailto:navin.kukr...@suse.com> <navin.kukr...@suse.com >>>>> <mailto:navin.kukr...@suse.com>> wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Why do we have two ports in etc/jetty.xml file? >>>>> >>>>> I installed Beryllium on a server but I am running another service on >>>>> port 8080 and when I load dlux feature, it stays in graceperiod because >>>>> port 8080 is unavailable. I completely removed 'addConnector' section for >>>>> port 8080 from etc/jetty.xml file and it worked. >>>>> >>>>> Is port 8080 just a abckup port for web portal? >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Navin >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> controller-dev mailing list >>>>> controller-dev@lists.opendaylight.org >>>>> <mailto:controller-dev@lists.opendaylight.org> >>>>> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/controller-dev >>>>> <https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/controller-dev> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> controller-dev mailing list >>>>> controller-dev@lists.opendaylight.org >>>>> <mailto:controller-dev@lists.opendaylight.org> >>>>> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/controller-dev >>>>> <https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/controller-dev> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >
_______________________________________________ controller-dev mailing list controller-dev@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/controller-dev
