David Walluck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> No, take a look at this. It says i386 where it should say i586. That
> must be the problem since using rpm release 47 with an old rpmrc works
> fine. So the rpmrc is at fault here.
i am stupid, thanks.
> --- rpmrc.broke Mon Jan 24 13:45:11 2000
> +++ rpmrc.old Tue Jan 25 23:53:39 2000
> @@ -110,17 +110,17 @@
--Chmouel
- [Cooker] Re[2]: vim/ctags problem: tags file not... Brian J. Murrell
- Re: [Cooker] Re[2]: vim/ctags problem: tags ... Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] Re: vim/ctags problem: tags... Brian J. Murrell
- Re: [Cooker] Re: vim/ctags problem:... Chmouel Boudjnah
- [Cooker] Re[2]: vim/ctags problem: tags file not... Brian J. Murrell
- Re: [Cooker] Re[2]: vim/ctags problem: tags ... Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] Re: vim/ctags problem: tags... Brian J. Murrell
- [Cooker] rpmrc still broken David Walluck
- Re: [Cooker] rpmrc still broken Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] rpmrc still broken David Walluck
- [Cooker] Problem with new RPM packa... Chmouel Boudjnah
- [Cooker] Problem with new RPM package (release 46) David Walluck
- Re: [Cooker] Problem with new RPM package (release 4... Chmouel Boudjnah
