Le lun 10/03/2003 � 16:17, Buchan Milne a �crit : > > This could be great indeed, any idea how to improve urpmi/rpmdrake is > > welcome as next version will be designed soon now. > > A request from the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list was to have a delay > available, so that you could run updates daily, but never get an update > which was less than X days old. This would allow you to run with delay > of 0 on a test server, and a greater delay on production machines (10-15 > days seems to be about optimal according to some studies), allowing you > to have peace-of-mind that you will not unknowingly install a broken > update on a production server, assuming you keep an eye on the test > server or the security lists.
Ok, noted. > The problem was AFAIK not due to, or fixable by urpmi, since we have > samba-server obsolete samba-server-ldap, and vice versa, to allow people > to switch between them easily. This is really a hack due to samba only > having compile-time configurable account backends in 2.2.x, solved in > 3.0 with run-time configurable (including multi) account backends. This was not obsoletes but conflicts which was needed, urpmi ask confirmation to remove the conflicting package. Fran�ois.
