On 17 Jun 2003, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > about this before. There was also a post about the slow search (to which > > didn't quite satisfactory answer IM0, why is kpackage quicker in searching > > than rpmdrake? Do you think it can be optimized?) > > what kpackage search? rpmdrake-remove search in names and > descriptions is lightning fast, which is equivalent to what > kpackage does I suppose? search in files is a little bit slower > but still ok. > > slower searches are in hdlist's but that doesn't compare to > kpackage, or I've been living inside water the last years?
duh..my fault, being stupid. I just tested and it is more or less equal, except ofcourse if you search uninstalled files. kpackage can only to that on local drives. rpmdrake uses hdlists. Please forget about my complaining, search speed is fine! d.
