> > -some people do not have the bandwith to download 90% uninteresting > > messages > > ??? I think this is relevent for 0.1% of ppl out there.
This is relevant for only 0,1% because people need some bandwidth to follow cooker ml, and so, people with low bandwidth are not here. But, this would also save the bandwidth of the mail server. > > -cooker is too much a discussion club instead of a technical list. > > If you post a patch, people are first going to debate whether it is > > wortwhile of actually trying it. > > Debating on the patch is a *good* thing IMHO. After all, we want > to build a community distro, not only ours. I fully agree. But, this won't change because we split the list. I even think that more people will discuss because the discussion will be more focused. > > And the maintainer in question doesn't reply. I hope > > Mdk maintainer not answering on this mailing-list is another > problem, which won't be solved by splitting the ml, for sure. Not for all, but for some, yes, this will help. Even it doesn't solve all problem, if it solves 50%, is is enough. > > I would even go so far as to propose the list being not freely > > accessible. > > Humbly against that (non free access is frightening by itself). I agree. -- Micka�l Scherer
