On Monday 07 July 2003 02:49 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 7 Jul 2003, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> > ??? I think this is relevent for 0.1% of ppl out there.
>
> <ironic>That must be 10% of all linux users!</ironic>
> It is always good practice to make even small minorities happy, if it
> does not make a majority unhappy, IMO.
>
> > Debating on the patch is a *good* thing IMHO. After all, we want
> > to build a community distro, not only ours.
>
> I didn't say it was bad, cooker is there for that, but perhaps
> productivity could be improved.
>
> > Mdk maintainer not answering on this mailing-list is another
> > problem, which won't be solved by splitting the ml, for sure.
>
> Well, I was under the impression that some used the excuse not having time
> to read/reply to 100rds of mails a day.
Dumb excuse IF the poster CC's the maintainer with problems, should be in the
maintainer's mailbox separate from cooker, and not have [Cooker] in the
subject, so won't (hopefully) be filtered out. An acknowlegement that the
problem was received - even if no fix if forthcoming any time soon - would go
a long way to keeping the flames on low heat :-)
>
> > Well hoping is not enough. I hope so too, but I think this has
> > absolutely zero chance to happen.
>
> well, we disagree:)
>
> > > I would even go so far as to propose the list being not freely
> > > accessible.
> >
> > Humbly against that (non free access is frightening by itself)
>
> well, you're allready against split-lists, so no use in discussing
> implementation me thinks.
>
>
> d.
Vinny
