On 7 Jul 2003, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > > ??? I think this is relevent for 0.1% of ppl out there.
<ironic>That must be 10% of all linux users!</ironic> It is always good practice to make even small minorities happy, if it does not make a majority unhappy, IMO. > Debating on the patch is a *good* thing IMHO. After all, we want > to build a community distro, not only ours. I didn't say it was bad, cooker is there for that, but perhaps productivity could be improved. > Mdk maintainer not answering on this mailing-list is another > problem, which won't be solved by splitting the ml, for sure. Well, I was under the impression that some used the excuse not having time to read/reply to 100rds of mails a day. > Well hoping is not enough. I hope so too, but I think this has > absolutely zero chance to happen. well, we disagree:) > > I would even go so far as to propose the list being not freely accessible. > > Humbly against that (non free access is frightening by itself). well, you're allready against split-lists, so no use in discussing implementation me thinks. d.
