"Guillaume Cottenceau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Guillaume Cottenceau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, May 29, 2000 9:36 AM
> Subject: Re: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION - Kudos
>
>
> > "Hoyt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >
> > I'm afraid, it will be a *lot* of work for us [Denis+me] to 100% follow
> > the mailing lists and also internal discussions that are currently very
> > heavy; so reading through recent archives would be very difficult, taking
> > also in account that the guys on this mailing list are informed of this
> > discussion process, so they can re-think what they always critized in
> > Mandrake, and tell us!
> >
>
> Just =two= people for such an important project? Surely MandrakeSoft can do
> better? Hire some temporary help to sift through the data and organize it.
> Better data usually means better decisions; it is money well spent.
Actually you can see more than 2 persons of MandrakeSoft often posting on
cooker. Denis and me are just supposed to write down *every* of your
proposals, and feed them in our internal discussion forums. I believe
Denis asked me to do this for Cooker because I often post on this mailing
list, so I can "dail^H^H^H^Hhourly" check what's happening.
Actually lately I've been really busy with other stuff so it's a bit hard
to recover this late, but I'm struggling.
And, you know, everyone here is keeping well informed on what's happening
on the external forums, etc, so we may think of a pretty good quantity of
what people would like.
--
Guillaume Cottenceau
