> "Hoyt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Just =two= people for such an important project? Surely MandrakeSoft can do > > ???? Do you see only two mandrakesoft employment on Cooker ? > Pixel/Guillaume/Me read and participe to everything, others answer to > his subject. > Sorry -- Guillaume Cottenceau in his post indicated only two peolpe were doing the data mining: "I'm afraid, it will be a *lot* of work for us [Denis+me] to 100% follow the mailing lists and also internal discussions that are currently very heavy; " Now they won't feel so alone. Hoyt
- Re: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION Harry Henry Gebel
- Re: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION John Grange
- Re: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION Anton Graham
- Re: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION James Chance
- Re: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION Eric MC DECLERCK
- Re: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION - Kudos Hoyt
- Re: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION - Ku... Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION ... Hoyt
- Re: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSS... Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DI... Hoyt
- Re: [Cooker] GET READY FOR ... Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] GET READY FOR ... Denis HAVLIK
- Re: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSS... Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION : less new di... Olivier Dugeon
- Re: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION : less n... Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION - Dependencie... Jonathan Prigot
- Re: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION - Depend... Stuart Krivis
- Re: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION - De... Jonathan Prigot
- Re: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION ... Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSS... Guillaume Rousse
