Denis HAVLIK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ################
> I am going to spend a lot of time in reading "newbie" and "expert" mailing
> lists during next two weeks. Guillaume will do the same on the
> "cooker" list, and other members of the company may pop-up and take
> part in discussion too, for topics they may be particularly interested in
> (and if they get time to do it, our schedule is bursting).
May I add something: the traffic seems to be quite big about this topic.
I'm currently trying to collect the propositions you guys are making. When
the proposition is clear enough, I will NOT answer the guy telling him
"what a good idea!", I will add it in the report I will publish at the end
of the discussion period.
So, if you ever make propositions, and we don't answer to it, it does not
mean this proposition is thrown to the bin -- this is to save both our and
your time reading this mailing-list.
However, when the proposition seems not enough clear to do something from
it, I will ask you to elaborate, etc.
PLEASE USE A RELEVANT TOPIC to your proposition. Already a guy "Lorne
Shantz" wrote very good proposals, but with an irrelevant topic. This is
hard to start a discussion on every of these proposals, given those
topics.
--
Guillaume Cottenceau
