--- David Walser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The breakdown of the libuser package is very strange > and confusing. You have: > libuser > libuser1 > libuser1-devel > > Then you have both libuser (which doesn't contain > the library) and libuser1 both say they provide > libuser. This can't be right. > > Then userdrake says it requires libuser, so it isn't > clear which package it wants. My guess is it just > needs the library. > > If so, userdrake should require libuser1 and > libuser1 should not provide libuser.
Actually, userdrake should just drop the explicit requires because RPM will figure it out. It kinda makes sense for libuser1 to provide libuser, and the package currently called libuser (accounting for the confusion) should be renamed to something more descriptive of what it actually contains. Maybe libuser-tools is more appropriate or something. It's the one that really shouldn't provide libuser. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com
