--- Buchan Milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 17 Jul 2003, David Walser wrote: > > > In that case it's also most likely a bug that > userdrake depends on "libuser" > > Probably not, as libuser contains the config file, > which I think userdrake > needs. I am not sure about the localisations (should > a library package not > allow localistaions? And if so, how should they be > versioned)? > > Regards, > Buchan
Well I can certainly believe that, but this highlights how confusing this is. If the "libuser" package had a more descriptive name, it would be better. And if there are other packages named like libfoo that don't contain a library, but something else, maybe they need to fixed too. Writing a spec file or something, I would expect to be able to say libfoo and mean the library libfoo. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com
