G�tz Waschk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Am Donnerstag, 17. Juli 2003, 08:05:26 Uhr MET, schrieb David Walser: > > Actually, userdrake should just drop the explicit > > requires because RPM will figure it out. It kinda > > makes sense for libuser1 to provide libuser, and the > > package currently called libuser (accounting for the > > confusion) should be renamed to something more > > descriptive of what it actually contains. Maybe > > libuser-tools is more appropriate or something. It's > > the one that really shouldn't provide libuser. > > Hi, > > I think the only bug is that libuser1 provides libuser.
My bad. Anyway, it's fixed in latest release (5mdk).
