On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 11:50:14AM +0100, Jaroslaw Zachwieja wrote: > On ??ro 23. lipca 2003 11:39, Keld J�rn Simonsen wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 08:22:48AM +0100, Jaroslaw Zachwieja wrote: > > > On ?ro 23. lipca 2003 03:34, Olivier Thauvin wrote: > > > > But lot of things are actually missing in RH: > > > > urpmi > > > > > > Cmon, RH makes money on up2date - they have a real package management > > > system, just want you to pay money for it. Apt-get still a pile of > > > --force --nodeps poo. > > > > apt-get is production quality for redhat. But not for Mandrake. > > Probably due to errors in the dependencies. > > You call broken updates, upgrades, conflicts, unintentional rollbacks and > coredumps a "production quality"??? Maybe in RH terms :))))
I have not experienced that. Anyway I would be interested in hearing about your experiences, and suggested ways forward. They say that apt-get works swell on debian, so distributions like redhat and mandrake should be able to do it too. And mandrakeupdate/urpmi and up2date do the job - where is the difference? best regards keld
