On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 16:14, Keld J�rn Simonsen wrote: > On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 03:48:23PM +0200, Stefan van der Eijk wrote: > > Keld J�rn Simonsen wrote: > > >>>On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 08:22:48AM +0100, Jaroslaw Zachwieja wrote: > > >>> > > >>You call broken updates, upgrades, conflicts, unintentional rollbacks and > > >>coredumps a "production quality"??? Maybe in RH terms :)))) > > >> > > >I have not experienced that. Anyway I would be interested in hearing > > >about your experiences, and suggested ways forward. They say that > > >apt-get works swell on debian, so distributions like redhat and mandrake > > >should be able to do it too. And mandrakeupdate/urpmi and up2date do > > >the job - where is the difference? > > > > > Main difference (IMHO, from what I've seen): > > > > * urpmi is a cash generator. You need to pay (or tollerate being > > nagged every 60 days) to use it; > > Hmm, I don't pay for Mandrake urpmi service, nor do I get 60 days > nagging. But maybe that is because I have paid in blood to Mandrake (I > have done translations, so I have a VIP mandrakeclub membership.). > But I have also paid in blood to RedHat, and done quite some > translations for other OSS projects. And I run mirrors.
Sheesh. Learn to read INTELLIGENTLY, guys. It was a mistake. He meant to write up2date. If you look at the post for five seconds with half your brain engaged, that is obvious. -- adamw
