On Sun Aug 10 22:38 -0400, Greg Meyer wrote: > Cooker #1: I use kmail but not knode, so why can't we do like SuSE and allow > me to install kmail and not knode and all the other stuff that comes in > kdenetwork that I don't need. > > Cooker #2: But it makes it so much easier to manage KDE packaging to just > keep it all together, and disk space is cheap now anyway, so that shouldn't > be an issue. > > Cooker #1: But I don't like having stuff installed I don't use even though I > have the disk space. And what about the users on dial-up? Why should we make > them download all of kdenetwork when all they need is kmail. > > Cooker #2: But it is crazy to make a zillion KDE packages. How will people > know what they nedd?
Another argument in favor of splitting is that it minimizes the need to upload a massive package when one small component changes... -- Levi Ramsey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Take due notice and govern yourselves accordingly. Currently playing: Metallica - Cleveland OH Cuyahoga Falls Blossom Mus Linux 2.4.21-3mdk 12:15:00 up 6 days, 21:33, 11 users, load average: 0.15, 0.19, 0.22
