On Sunday 10 August 2003 09:45 pm, Texstar wrote: > Its just crazy breaking all this source code into thousands of rpms.
My thinking is the granularity is just a little too fine. I don't mind so much that the pieces are smaller - but i think they're TOO small. I'm also a little annoyed that packages who have libraries that are not designed to be used by other applications have been "Libified" . It's one thing if other apps will use the libraries (ie, xine) to be split - but since the application package and the lib package always travel together, what's wrong with leaving them as one solid package? > > On Sunday 10 August 2003 05:30 pm, w9ya wrote: > > More to the point, as of two dayas ago, the deps were screwed up enough > > that you could not do an upgrade without doing a no-deps on this (kde et > > al) and MANY other packages including samba. I agree this is > > unacceptable. Instead of arguing at length, at least get this much > > working correctly please. V.
