Ainsi parlait Luca Berra :
> no, it is not needed,
> postfix works wonderfully with
> mailbox_command =
> which means that postfix local takes care of deliveries, it even works
> better than procmail with maildirs
>
> the above should be the default and
> procmail %post and %postun could invoke
> postconf -e 'mailbox_command = /usr/bin/procmail -Y -a $DOMAIN'
> and
> postconf -e 'mailbox_command = '
>
> to add remove procmail support with the package
Luca, you should provide ready to use patches for postfix spec, gc would
barely reject them i think.
--
Guillaume Rousse
The pattern you wanted to make again will have one key piece missing
-- Murphy's Laws of Sewing n�7- Re: [Cooker] Re: What happened to am-utils? Vincent Danen
- Re: [Cooker] Re: What happened to am-utils? Buchan Milne
- Re: [Cooker] Re: What happened to am-utils? Vincent Danen
- Re: [Cooker] Re: What happened to am-utils? Michael Scherer
- Re: [Cooker] Re: What happened to am-uti... Buchan Milne
- Re: [Cooker] Re: What happened to am-uti... Michael Scherer
- Re: [Cooker] Re: What happened to am-uti... Ben Reser
- Re: [Cooker] Re: What happened to am-utils? Luca Berra
- Re: [Cooker] Re: What happened to am-utils? Michael Scherer
- Re: [Cooker] Re: What happened to am-uti... Luca Berra
- Re: [Cooker] Re: What happened to am-uti... Guillaume Rousse
- Re: [Cooker] Re: What happened to am-uti... Buchan Milne
- Re: [Cooker] Re: What happened to am-uti... Guillaume Rousse
- Re: [Cooker] Postfix vs. Procmail (Was: ... Luca Berra
- Re: [Cooker] Re: What happened to am-utils? Bryan Whitehead
- Re: [Cooker] Re: What happened to am-utils? Buchan Milne
- Re: [Cooker] Re: What happened to am-utils? Warly
- Re: [Cooker] Re: What happened to am-uti... Buchan Milne
- Re: [Cooker] Re: What happened to am-uti... Olivier Thauvin
- Re: [Cooker] Re: What happened to am-utils? Bryan Whitehead
- Re: [Cooker] Re: What happened to am-utils? Buchan Milne
