Le Jeudi 23 Octobre 2003 16:13, FACORAT Fabrice a �crit : > Le jeu 23/10/2003 � 10:25, Frederic Crozat a �crit : > > And if people were reporting bugs/responding to queries DURING the > > beta/RC period, more bugs would be fixed BEFORE final release... > > excuse me, but most people will test during RC period, but the problem > was you release ... how many ... 2 RC ! after RC2 there were many bugs > remaining to fix, and some people could not install RC2 on their > computer. When i could see that some people were beginning to install > RC2, they had many problems with screensavers, etc ... > Yesterday I contact konica because I had a problem with a printer. The > technician in order to test the printer under linux as I was using mdk > install ... RC2 ( yes that's the last one available ).
As the overall time can't be expanded, it could be better to have 2 beta and 3 RC instead of 3 beta and 2RC. As people use to test only RC, this is a way to get a best bug report. > Have you have a look at RC of OO.org ? You were able to release a RC > with mdk 9.2 because there was practically no differences between the > final RC and the final version. OOo did five RC which were truely Release Candidate. However OOo is far less complicated as a full distro. -- Pierre Jarillon - http://pjarillon.free.fr/ Vice-pr�sident de l'ABUL : http://abul.org/
