That was khttpd, and it didn't suck, it just wasn't being maintained in 2.5.
Diego Iastrubni wrote: > if i am not mistaking, it was removed in 2.6 since it sux ass so much. > > why would you need that? http in user mode is good enough. > > ???? ?????, 2 ??????? 2003, 18:03, ???? ?? ??? Oden Eriksson: >> Hi. >> >> I asked to have TUX included before but it was decided not to use the patch >> because security considerations. But now there's new times with zillions of >> kernels laying around. So, maybe Thomas or some one else would consider >> implementing TUX into a new server oriented kernel? >> >> http://freshmeat.net/branches/45229/ >> >> I tried to use the update 9.2 kernel but got rejects, this is simply too >> time consuming for me. >> >> So whatcha say? > > >
