http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6221
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-11-05 18:42 -------
There is no category because you should have emailed webmaster.
I'm not sure if you're looking at a cached copy of the page, but the only reference to
9.1 I see is the
link to the 9.1 errata. The 9.1 CD-ROM typeo was fixed a few weeks ago.
Putting a link to MDKSA-2003:020 is completely cosmetic. That hardly constitutes a
bug, but I've
done it.
I also think calling the errata page "badly organized and typo-ridden" is a gross
exageration.
There was one typeo which was fixed weeks ago. Badly organized? errata.php3 is a
symlink to
92errata.php3. You want a cute little list of links? Go to
http://www.mandrakesecure.net/
advisories/ and you'll have a link not only to all the advisories for a particular
release, but a link to
their respective errata pages as well.
--
Configure bugmail: http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
------- Reminder: -------
assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
status: RESOLVED
creation_date:
description:
Firstly, this is about the page in http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/errata.php3
and there seems to be no category in bugzilla where I could place these bugs.
1) In http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/errata.php3#install it says:
"Remove the floppy and reboot using the Mandrake Linux 9.1 CD1 to do a CD-ROM
installation."
What does a LM9.1 CD1 have to do with LM9.2 installation. Should this not be
"Remove the floppy and reboot using the Mandrake Linux 9.2 CD1 to do a CD-ROM
installation."
instead ? Looks like you need an "errata on errata" page !!
2) In http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/errata.php3#webcam
it says:
"Solution: Upgrade to kernel 2.4.22-18mdk in updates (MDKA-2003:020) "
Won't it be nice to put a link in "MDKA-2003:020" to http://
www.mandrakesecure.net/en/advisories/advisory.php?name=MDKA-2003:020 ?
3) http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/errata.php3 is has a link for LM9.1 errata.
The LM9.1 errata page has a link for LM9.0 errata.
The LM9.0 errata page has a link for LM8.2 errata.
The LM8.2 errata page has a link for LM8.1 errata.
Whats the use of these hierarchical and cumbersome arrangement ?
Why not have one http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/errata.php3 page which will
list these 5 current links:
Mandrake 9.2 Errata http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/92errata.php3
Mandrake 9.1 Errata http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/91errata.php3
Mandrake 9.0 Errata http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/90errata.php3
Mandrake 8.2 Errata http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/82errata.php3
Mandrake 8.1 Errata http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/81errata.php3
I am sure you realize that a badly organized and typo-ridden errata will only
make things worse.
