http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6221


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED




------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-11-05 22:01 -------
It's not passing the buck.  It would have gone directly to me.  And today was the 
first time I saw 
this report... now that you've pointed out the date and I've taken a look and saw that 
this was not 
reported today... my apologies.  I didn't realize you had reported this on the 24th.  
Do I recall what 
day it was fixed?  No.  I had incorrectly assumed that since I received the report 
today that it had 
been reported today.  No dishonest pretense... for some reason, bugzilla did not see 
fit to make 
me aware of this bug before today.  If I was trying to be dishonest, I would have said 
that it never 
said 9.1 and your eyes were playing tricks on you.  =)

My unwillingness to make things clearer?  Did I not update the page and put a link to 
the advisory 
in question?  I think that clearly indicates my willingness to do just that!

As for the last point; I suppose you can look at it however you like.  If you think it 
would be clearer 
the other way, perhaps you are right.  I don't think it's that unclear however.  Yes, 
it is certainly 
something that can be looked at.  No, it is not something I can do right now.  Perhaps 
when time 
permits.  Thanks.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


------- Reminder: -------
assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
status: RESOLVED
creation_date: 
description: 
Firstly, this is about the page in http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/errata.php3 
and there seems to be no category in bugzilla where I could place these bugs. 
 
1) In http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/errata.php3#install it says: 
 
"Remove the floppy and reboot using the Mandrake Linux 9.1 CD1 to do a CD-ROM 
installation." 
 
What does a LM9.1 CD1 have to do with LM9.2 installation. Should this not be 
 
"Remove the floppy and reboot using the Mandrake Linux 9.2 CD1 to do a CD-ROM 
installation."  
 
instead ? Looks like you need an "errata on errata" page !! 
 
2) In http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/errata.php3#webcam  
 
it says: 
 
"Solution: Upgrade to kernel 2.4.22-18mdk in updates (MDKA-2003:020) " 
 
Won't it be nice to put a link in "MDKA-2003:020" to http://
www.mandrakesecure.net/en/advisories/advisory.php?name=MDKA-2003:020 ? 
 
3) http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/errata.php3 is has a link for LM9.1 errata. 
The LM9.1 errata page has a link for LM9.0 errata. 
The LM9.0 errata page has a link for LM8.2 errata. 
The LM8.2 errata page has a link for LM8.1 errata. 
 
Whats the use of these hierarchical and cumbersome arrangement ? 
Why not have one http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/errata.php3 page which will 
list these 5 current links: 
 
Mandrake 9.2 Errata http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/92errata.php3 
Mandrake 9.1 Errata http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/91errata.php3 
Mandrake 9.0 Errata http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/90errata.php3 
Mandrake 8.2 Errata http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/82errata.php3 
Mandrake 8.1 Errata http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/81errata.php3 
 
I am sure you realize that a badly organized and typo-ridden errata will only 
make things worse.

Reply via email to