http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6221
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-11-05 18:45 ------- Ooops... http://www.mandrakesecure.net/en/advisories/ -- Configure bugmail: http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ------- Reminder: ------- assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] status: RESOLVED creation_date: description: Firstly, this is about the page in http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/errata.php3 and there seems to be no category in bugzilla where I could place these bugs. 1) In http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/errata.php3#install it says: "Remove the floppy and reboot using the Mandrake Linux 9.1 CD1 to do a CD-ROM installation." What does a LM9.1 CD1 have to do with LM9.2 installation. Should this not be "Remove the floppy and reboot using the Mandrake Linux 9.2 CD1 to do a CD-ROM installation." instead ? Looks like you need an "errata on errata" page !! 2) In http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/errata.php3#webcam it says: "Solution: Upgrade to kernel 2.4.22-18mdk in updates (MDKA-2003:020) " Won't it be nice to put a link in "MDKA-2003:020" to http:// www.mandrakesecure.net/en/advisories/advisory.php?name=MDKA-2003:020 ? 3) http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/errata.php3 is has a link for LM9.1 errata. The LM9.1 errata page has a link for LM9.0 errata. The LM9.0 errata page has a link for LM8.2 errata. The LM8.2 errata page has a link for LM8.1 errata. Whats the use of these hierarchical and cumbersome arrangement ? Why not have one http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/errata.php3 page which will list these 5 current links: Mandrake 9.2 Errata http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/92errata.php3 Mandrake 9.1 Errata http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/91errata.php3 Mandrake 9.0 Errata http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/90errata.php3 Mandrake 8.2 Errata http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/82errata.php3 Mandrake 8.1 Errata http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/81errata.php3 I am sure you realize that a badly organized and typo-ridden errata will only make things worse.
