Seeing as how cooker is a development system, perhaps when packaging stuff for Cooker, the binaries shouldn't be stripped. This would make it easier to try and track down bugs instead of downloading the SRPM and trying to fix it. Then when it's time to move the packages to a release, you can strip them again to save the normal users space. It's hard to track down a bug when the backtrace looks like this: #0 0x8059111 in strcpy () #1 0x1 in ?? () #2 0x80542d9 in strcpy () #3 0x6 in ?? () #4 0x8080d00 in ?? () (Trying to figure out why my xterm doesn't run anymore...) Ian
- RE: [Cooker] Cooker and stripping binaries Ian White
- RE: [Cooker] Cooker and stripping binaries Geoffrey Lee
- Re: [Cooker] Cooker and stripping binaries Yoann Vandoorselaere
- RE: [Cooker] Cooker and stripping binari... Geoffrey Lee
- Re: [Cooker] Cooker and stripping bi... Yoann Vandoorselaere
- Re: [Cooker] Cooker and strippi... Ian White
- Re: [Cooker] Cooker and str... Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] Cooker and stripping binari... Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] Cooker and stripping bi... Yoann Vandoorselaere
- Re: [Cooker] Cooker and strippi... Thierry Vignaud
- Re: [Cooker] Cooker and str... Yoann Vandoorselaere
